Cinematic Blues – 2/22/2010

Cinematic Blues – 2/22/2010

These were the movies I watched on Monday, Feb. 22, 2010.

These were 3 movies recommended through all of the fellow pop culture nerds here at Pop Bunker. Let’s see how it all worked out.

black dynamite 2 203x300 Cinematic Blues   2/22/2010BLACK DYNAMITE

Director: Scott Sanders

Elwood Says: 5 Plates of Roscoe’s Chili and Donuts out of 5

“Black Dynamite” is equal parts satire of, and love letter to, the blacksploitation films of the 70s. It’s also funny as hell, you dig? This is not a “Naked Gun” satire, though.

“Black Dynamite” will fricassee y’alls honkey asses. Ka-CHOW!

This film has been covered here at Pop Bunker. A lot. I don’t have much new to add to what’s been said.

Just see this movie. Not only will you be in danger of peeing yourself laughing, but you will witness one of the most heartfelt, authentic, and genuinely made movies I’ve seen in a long time. Watch the extras on the DVD or Blu-Ray, and you’ll see why I say that.

district9poster thumb 450x665 202x300 Cinematic Blues   2/22/2010DISTRICT 9

Director: Neil Blomkamp

Elwood Says: 3 cans of cat food out of 5

I didn’t get it.

I mean, I got what “District 9″ was trying to tell me, and I understood the framing device. I thought the SFX were outstanding, and the acting was top notch.

Still…the movie is bored the snot out of me.

What social commentary was “District 9″ offering? What first seemed like a treatise on immigration became a very slanted AIDS allegory, wrapped in a terrorism parallel.

If “District 9″ was about apartheid, then what/who does Wikus represent? All respect to Jackson and Blomkamp, but their vision is blurry here. It doesn’t have to be a direct correlation, and it may simply be that I don’t know enough about the origins and history of apartheid, but I just wasn’t in the groove with the film.

Muddy & unsure of its own message, I find “District 9″ lacking for substance. Still, it was well shot and technically superb, which helped boost the final verdict.

inglourious basterds poster1 205x300 Cinematic Blues   2/22/2010INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS

Director: Quentin Tarantino

Elwood Says: 4 shots of 33-year-old scotch out of 5

I’m not sure I can say it better than Johnny Slick did.

Brad Pitt was having the time of his life making this movie, and the praise I have for Christoph Waltz could be an essay of its own. That man was ruthless, smarmy, evil, and incredibly charming all in one twitch of his eyebrow. I would not want to be on the receiving end of a Colonel Landa interrogation. No, Sir.

The film within the film (“Nation’s Pride”) added a layer of meta to “Basterds” that made it even better.

While obviously scoring no points for historical accuracy, that was probably Tarantino’s funnest film since “Pulp Fiction.”

“Inglourious Basterds” was an excellent ride. Fantastic, bloody, and greatly absurd.

Similar Posts:

Popularity: 3% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark


PANTS!

About the Author

Elwood J. Blues Elwood J. Blues is both Editor and Author at PopBunker.net. From his abode at 1060 West Addison, Elwood spends what little spare time Dale affords him getting people addicted to comic books. When he's not writing recaps of various television shows, Elwood's also working on his weekly column called "Cinematic Blues" - his weekly rundown of the movies that come to the Bunker delivered in little red envelopes. You can also follow Elwood on Twitter, if you're so inclined. He's On A Mission From God.