In this age of the internet, Twitter, Facebook, blogs, and all other forms of instant media it becomes harder and harder to avoid spoilers for your favorite TV shows, movies, comics, etc. I’ve been taken to task more than once for blurting out something on any of the above social medias that ruined someone else’s enjoyment of what I was watching. So I’m here today to discuss my thoughts on the matter.
I’ve been around the internet long enough to remember the days of IRC (Internet Relay Chat), and also the long, long ago when you had to watch TV shows the day they aired, or shortly after if you recorded the show on your VCR (Google it, children). Discussions were held live and in person amongst others who had seen it. Trade publications were still running a few days to a week behind on reviews, casting news, and plot points. Spoilers, as they are known now, weren’t really as big an issue.
It’s a different world now. DVRs and “time-shifting” allow the viewer to watch on their own schedule. Websites like Hulu are airing more and more first-run shows everyday, and most of the major networks put new shows up for viewing on their own websites as well. DVD and Blu-Ray sets for entire seasons or complete series are getting progressively less expensive. It’s almost so you don’t need cable anymore to be able to watch anything you want.
So what should the new rules be regarding spoilers? Nevermind the fact that what constitutes a “spoiler” is fluid and subjective, based on the opinion of the person who feels spoiled.
Back in the days of Television Without Pity – a site I used to frequent a lot – their forums were strictly moderated. Spoilers were allowed in certain areas only, and anything else was deleted. Discussion of new TV episodes were allowed only after they had aired live (on the East Coast), and forums were locked down to prevent early chit-chat. The concept was simple, though: Once the show went “live” it was fair game for open discussion. If you didn’t want to hear about it, you didn’t go in those forums.
This is pretty much where I land still. If the show has aired on television, people are going to talk about it. This is common sense. If you don’t want anything ruined for you, that’s YOUR responsibility to avoid arenas where people might be talking about it. Simple, right?
I’m willing to concede in the DVR age that a 24-hour moratorium might be prudent, but anyone who’s spent more than five minutes on the internet knows that 99% of the time that won’t be strictly observed. I get just as frustrated as anyone with reading East Coast tweets on shows I can’t watch for three hours, but they’re there. I can’t fix it, so I accept it.
I read a lot of entertainment/pop culture blogs and websites. I read a lot of trade publications and magazines. I’m on Twitter constantly. Spoilers are simply a fact of life, and it’s the individual’s personal responsibility to find a way to avoid them in whatever manner suits them. However, if I’m watching a show on my DVR that aired four days ago, and I tweet about it in detail? Oh, well. If I’ve waited three years to catch up on a TV show via DVD sets, I not only fully expect to know a great deal about the show and its story prior to viewing, but I’ll not censor my reactions to it either.
The same rules can be applied to movies and comics, too. Not everyone goes to the theater on a regular basis, and I’m one of those people. I tend to wait for DVD on just about everything. It’s safe to say that by the time I get around to watching a movie I’ve heard/read enough about it to know just about everything. I don’t find this takes away from my enjoyment of the film in any way; it just is.
Does this mean I’m going to lash out at anyone who spoils the film as they walk out of the theater? No. They’ve seen it. It’s out in the world. It’s fair game.
Besides, what a spoiler is depends on the movie is. If you get bent out of shape when I tell you that the boat sinks at the end of “Titanic” – something that is historical and documented real-life fact – you’ve got bigger problems than some mouthy douchebag in your twitter stream.
Comics, on the other hand, can be the worst medium for spoilers. They just fly around all day on CBR and Newsarama, usually from the writers and artists themselves. The forums are always lit up with speculation, and constant updates from whatever conventions are going on at the time make avoiding spoilers impossible with anything less than a complete cone of silence. Especially for the readers that “wait for the trade.” As a comic book retailer, I try to stay up on current stories and news about the industry, so spoilers don’t even register with me anymore.
I don’t know what, if any, solution there is to this. My bottom line is, and will remain, that spoiling anything before it is available for the masses is inexcusable. Once the media in question hits the airwaves, big screens, or bookshelves however, it becomes our individual responsibility to avoid spoilers (both giving and receiving).
If you don’t want to know, don’t read about it. That’s what I do.
Similar Posts:
- True Blood Fan Yet? You will be. You will be.
- Ghostwatch (1992)
- [Product Review] Clicker.com
- DC Comics Reboot in September?
- Review: Independent Comic Zombie Outlaw
- My Dad’s Full of Shatner
- Twin Peaks revived by Maclachlan?
Popularity: 1% [?]



Ah, man, nice article. I never know with this type of thing. I can confirm for you that one doesn’t need cable anymore to watch whatever he wants: I’ve not had cable for four years. I actually didn’t watch a single tv show other than a few I picked up off DVD like HBOs Carnivale. Later shows like Deadwood and Dexter became my must see tv. I’ve had to make some due with cable shows like Dexter – usually that due is a willing friend to show his couch or DV of the show.
As for spoilers, it’s so hard. We of the internet have a hive mentality and spoilers can kind of build from the hive interacting. I bit my twitter-tongue like crazy to keep from posting [Spoiler, Maybe], “OMFG I CAN’T BELIEVE DEXTER HAS CANCER. ZEUS CHRIST #DEXTER,” but I also think that you’re right – folks should be aware that these things are out there. Hell, many sites even live blog certain shows – so be careful refreshing a RSS feed!
I did add a spoiler tag for this site – just to play it safe.
That being said I believe the viewer who is super conscious about spoilers should take some responsibility themselves. I think tweetdeck and real-time filter columns, so one might be able to go that route to filter out a live hashtag.
Now, kiddies, listen to this: I remember the days of the BBS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletin_board_system) and tv/movie discussions. Those had strict rules about discussions as well, but back in the those days even taping shows on a VCR was a rare thing – so the service was often used more by folks that missed shows with no hope of seeing it until summer re-runs.
How ironic that a comment on a post about spoilers just spoiled the latest season of Dexter for me–I’m only on ep. 4. ::headdesk:: Alas.
.-= Lindsay Dunaev´s last blog ..LJo83: RT @sesamestreet: Cookie Monster: Sometimes Moon look like giant cookie. Must look into joining space program. =-.
It was a joke. You just don’t know my humor. That was, like, a really extreme and totally fake example.
*whew*
Since it’s Dexter, it didn’t even occur to me that you might be making it up.
.-= Lindsay Dunaev´s last blog ..LJo83: RT @sesamestreet: Cookie Monster: Sometimes Moon look like giant cookie. Must look into joining space program. =-.
Man…just can’t win for trying, huh?
.-= Elwood´s last blog ..Changes in Latitude, Changes in Attitude =-.
Rita was WHAT?!?!?!? You bastard.
.-= Elwood´s last blog ..Changes in Latitude, Changes in Attitude =-.
I think it’s a pretty simple thing to add the word “spoiler” to a post from the east coast regarding a show that hasn’t aired on the west coast yet. I don’t, however feel like it belongs in a tweet that says, “OMG Vader is Luke’s father!” That’s not a spoiler; it’s a piece of pop culture history. I’m not sure exactly where the line is, but as a matter of courtesy, a 7-character word to alert readers isn’t a huge concession to erring on the side of caution.
That said, I have a close friend who has only been truly angry with me once in our years of talking about every topic under the sun, and that was when I let it slip that Dumbledore dies. I could understand his disappointment, but how was I to know that he’d vowed to not read the Harry Potter books until he’d seen all the movies? The book had been out for years and don’t feel like repeating that here now is giving away a spoiler, either.
wtf!? Dumbledore dies!?!!?
*giggle*
.-= Erin´s last blog ..Who says vegetarians can’t make a good hash? =-.
I’ve never read Harry Potter, and I’ve only seen the first movie once. Therefore, you can tell me whatever you want to, since I have no intention of reading/watching ever.
Which is an excellent case of spoilers being in the eye of the beholder.
Nothing wrong with a #spoiler hashtag though.
.-= Elwood Blues´s last blog ..Changes in Latitude, Changes in Attitude =-.
I think that’s probably the most important component of “The Spoiler Alert” though. You HAVE to know your audience. Making a Vader is Luke’s Father or Dumbledore dies comment in a forum of sci-fi and fantasy fans is probably going to be fine. However this idea that this is all fair game in all media can be frustrating.
It kinda makes me a little sad that future generations of movie watchers will NEVER be able to watch Soylent Green without ALREADY knowing what it’s made out of…
.-= MYMHM´s last blog ..39 – Jeff Cannata Drops by with ‘Melvin Goes to Dinner’! =-.
I have always had philosophy about things I want to see, I don’t read about them. If it’s a movie I really want to see or a TV show I watch, I just don’t read the article. The idea that it’s hard to avoid spoilers isn’t true unless you have some douche who will lend you a copy of the Usual Suspects while saying, #spoiler ‘Kevin Spacey is Keyser Soze’. Day to day it really isn’t that hard. If you want to enjoy a film or TV show in it’s true form, you just have to avoid the temptation to sneak a peak
I think he’s thinking of the fact you can have several window air conditioners, they can be installed individually at any time, and any handy individual could install their own. Not necessarily the best analogy, but there you have it.